AIM is Dead!
<a href="https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/background">Background vector created by Makyzz - Freepik.com</a>
AOL Instant Messenger is officially dead. It was created in October 1997 by AOL and it used to be one of the most popular instant messaging services that allowed users to communicate in real-time.
From the late 90's to the mid 2000's it was the leading instant messaging application in North America but as other social networks started to appear, like Facebook and Twitter, AIM lost popularity leading to its shutdown in December 2017.
Although, nowadays, almost anyone uses it, the ''old school'' users are feeling sad and very nostalgic about this whole situation. They feel that this is ''the end of an era'' and it trully is.
We live in a world in constant change. What appears to be new and trending today, tomorrow will be old and forgotten. AOL said in a blog post ''AIM tapped into new digital technologies and ignited a cultural shift, but the way in which we communicate with eachother has profoundly changed'' and their response to why AIM is being shutted down was ''Our focus will always be on providing the kind of innovative experiences consumers want. We're more excited than ever to focus on building the next generation of iconic brands and life changing products.''
It's all about the innovation and in an universe as competitive as the technologic it's hard to keep it interesting. Facebook is huge now but in ten years it might not be as popular as it is today or it could be already discontinued. We will never know.
Jorge Marage
https://mashable.com/2017/12/15/aim-has-officially-died/#VyxOLZb1WPqW
Is Social Media bad for your Health?
Around 3 Billion people, 40% of the world population, spend, in average 2 hours every day, on social networks.
But, what are the consequences of this use? Could we be sacrificing our time, mental health and well-being just to keep up with everything that is constantly bombarded towards us?
BBC Future did some research and collected information concerning a few of the aspects and symptoms that might influence our experience when connected with social media.
In what concerns the stress, some people use social networks as an escape for reality and as a way to get rid of the daily stress. In 2015, researchers of Washington DC made a survey of 1,800 people and the results were interesting. Women were reported to be more stressed than men, but they also concluded that social media use was linked to ''modestly lower levels'' of stress.
Anxiety is also usually linked with social networks, especially Twitter, but nevertheless, the results show that, altough people who use seven or more social media platforms are more than 3 times likely to have high levels of general anxiety symptoms in comparison with the ones who only use 2 platforms, it's unclear if and how social media causes anxiety.
Depression is considered linked with social media by several studies. It was discovered that depression symptoms such as low mood and feelings of worthlessness and hopelessness, were linked to the quality of online interactions and that there is a higher risk of depression between those who use the most social media platforms. The reasons suggested for this situation were the cyber-bullying, having a distorted view of other people's lives and feeling that social media is a waste of time.
<a href="https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/feeling-the-pain-of-insecurity_1231178.htm">Designed by Freepik</a>
<a href="https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/portrait-of-young-assistant-sleeping-in-the-office_1238156.htm">Designed by Freepik</a>
In a world were technology is so present, it's obvious that we tend to stay connected more than we should. That affects us and our sleep. Research has found that the blue light in our devices affects the production of the hormone melatonin, which facilites sleep. However, researchers couldn't clarify whether social media causes disturbed sleep, or if those who have disturbed sleep spend more time on social media.
Everyday we are confronted with unrealistic representations of ''the perfect body'' across the social media. People, especially women, feel unacttractive when confronted with other women looks. This is the cause of a low self-esteem that affects the ''common ones''.
About loneliness, studies say that those who spend the most time on social media were twice as likely to report experiencing social isolation, which can include a lack of a sense of social belonging, engagement with others and fulfilling relationships. Spending more time on social media, the researchers said, could displace face-to-face interaction, and can also make people feel excluded.
The conclusion that BBC Future took of this was that social media affects each individual in a different way depending on their conditions and personality. They also concluded that, although the excessive use of social media is unwise, it would be wrong to say that social media is a bad thing because it brings countless benefits to our lives.
Jorge Marage
https://www.bbc.com/future/story/20180104-is-social-media-bad-for-you-the-evidence-and-the-unknowns
The Effect of Media Overexposure on the Human Psyche
<a href='https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/hands-with-laptop-and-virtual-world-map_979060.htm'>Designed by Freepik</a>
<a href="https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/bended-man-carrying-big-and-heavy-mobile-phone_1311230.htm">Designed by Freepik</a>
Presently, one is exposed to Media in all of its forms on a daily basis. This overexposure has made it so that the human psyche is metamorphosing in terms of its employment in perceiving society and indeed, life itself.
In a society steeping with billboards, screens, radios and headphones, one can find oneself perpetually fenced in a world conceived by Media. Such can in some cases create a rut, in which one is bombarded with Media in its myriad of forms throughout the day, eagerly awaiting a moment of peace in which one can "disconnect" oneself. Howbeit, said bombardment can, in other cases, create a thirst for further exposure, thus spawning the archetypical dependency of the Media addict, who will subconsciously check their smartphone every other minute for seldom no reason at all. Yet, what is it that lays in the genesis of this phenomenon?
Humans are prone to search, to inquire, to explore and most importantly, to interpret. Such stems from humanity's fear of the unknown and, simultaneously, from its tenacity and will to confront the unexplored in order to discover and then attempt to understand what new knowledge has been unearthed. Therefore, one might become intrigued, even if ever so slightly, upon seeing something as common as an advertisement about a new, state-of-the-art product. Thus, one can argue that, due to our detachment from the "real" world, Media is now becoming the main stimulator of our senses and nearly the sole provider of what we hear and see, and so they continuously devise new products, new formats, new amenities, new standards, new habits, and thusly new ways of life. All in an effort to give people more to interpret and more to consume.
Nevertheless, one can colloquially say that "more is less". Economically speaking, the supply (Media) is beginning to exceed its demand. The effort made by Media to keep us "fed" has had, in some cases, quite poor effects. People who are saturated with information can become impaired in terms of critical thinking for one can only discern and decipher so much One can see the effects of such represented in a recent psychological ailment known as SMO (Social Media Overload). One becomes overstimulated by Media to such a degree that one grows weary of Media exposure and becomes consequently jaded. Hence, one then attempts to pay little to no attention to one's surrounding world, becoming dissociated from it.
Pedro Carlos
Manipulation in Media
In a world where media messages are made to look as real and natural as possible, it becomes ever more difficult to discern that these media messages are quite simply constructions, thus they can very well be made to serve the interests of entities who control the various media that keep us entertained and informed.
As Noam Chomsky so brilliantly explains in his book, "Manufacturing Consent", media outlets like news broadcasts are constantly manipulated to better suit the agenda being pushed by the big corporations that control these outlets. "...among their other functions, the media serve, and propagandize on behalf of, the powerful societal interests that control and finance them. The representatives of these interests have important agendas and principles they want to advance, and they are well positioned to shape and constrain media policy."(Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent).
Considering that so much of what we hear and see is the directly shaped by "media editors" who act in accordance with the popular agenda that is being conveyed, it becomes increasingly difficult to be informed of what is truly occurring. The information we are given is a mere distilled version of reality, that has been formerly shaped and put together in a way that leaves out certain aspects that go against the agenda that is being advanced while enhancing others that confirm it. " This is normally not accomplished by crude intervention, but by the selection of right-thinking personnel and by the editors' and working journalists' internalization of priorities and definitions of newsworthiness that conform to the institution's policy."(Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent)
Pedro Carlos
https://pixabay.com/pt/rede-terra-continentes-globo-www-3079790/